Abstract:This attention of investors for this week attention is fixated on the actions of central banks, particularly the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank (ECB).
This attention of investors for this week attention is fixated on the actions of central banks, particularly the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank (ECB). The backdrop to this anticipation has been set by the unexpected rate hikes from the Reserve Bank of Australia and the Bank of Canada, which occurred last week. These moves, contrary to the prevailing consensus, have not only sent ripples through the financial markets but also reshaped the discourse around the durability of current interest rates. The financial community is now confronting the stark realisation that the much-anticipated rate cuts may not materialise this year and possibly might not surface until well into the next year.
One of the primary hurdles confronting central banks globally is the persistent challenge of core inflation that remains resistant to control. This unyielding predicament has been aggravated by the unexpected rate increases observed last week. Consequently, there is a growing belief that the previously anticipated “pause” by the Federal Reserve in rate alterations may no longer be a certainty. As of the composition of this writing, the likelihood of a 25 bps increase stands marginally below 30%.
With the ECB seemingly on the brink of a 25 basis point rate increase this week, a move expected to be mirrored by the Swiss National Bank and the Bank of England in the following week, the Federal Reserves stance might increasingly appear as an outlier. This divergence becomes even more pronounced in light of the recent indications of Fed policymakers. Before entering their media blackout period, these policymakers hinted strongly at a potential hiatus in rate adjustments in June, coupled with the possibility of another hike in July.
Nevertheless, the landscape of global finance is constantly shifting, and recent developments have further muddied the waters. OPEC+, a group of major oil-producing countries, has announced another round of production cuts. Meanwhile, the prospect of higher agricultural commodity prices looms on the horizon, spurred by the sabotage of a Ukrainian dam, which resulted in widespread flooding of farmland.
Inflationary pressures remain a pervasive challenge, with inflation rates stubbornly exceeding the target rate for all central banks. This raises a critical question: in the face of these pressures, can the U.S. Federal Reserve realistically affords to hit the pause button? Or, given the deflationary pressures emanating from China, is their cautious approach actually a prudent strategy?
Economic growth is already showing signs of deceleration in China in the post-pandemic era. Europe, Germany, and the EU are confronting a technical recession, with the UK possibly on a similar trajectory. Demand for oil and gas is also slowing, adding another layer of complexity to the situation. The decisions made by central banks this week could play a pivotal role in determining their future course of action. These decisions will indicate how much further central banks are willing to push before offering any insights into when they expect to halt the cycle of rate hikes.
The trajectory of inflation, the longevity of current interest rates, and the sustainability of economic growth across the globe are all hanging in the balance and the decision which these central banks will take will most likely give direction to the markets.
FXTM and AvaTrade are two well-established online brokers offering forex and CFD trading across global markets. Both enjoy strong reputations and high ratings on WikiFX—FXTM holds an AAA overall rating, while AvaTrade scores 9.49/10, indicating they’re regarded as reliable choices by the community. However, since brokers have great reputation in the industry, how do we know which one is more suitable for individuals to invest in? Today's article is about the comparison between FXTM and AvaTrade.
The yen's breakout above the 140 mark has caught global attention, and the reasons behind it are more than technical.
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has imposed a $300,000 fine on SpeedRoute LLC for a series of supervisory, risk management, and anti-money laundering (AML) program deficiencies spanning from 2017 to the present. Of this amount, $75,000 is payable to FINRA, with the remainder offset by SpeedRoute’s limited ability to pay. In addition to the monetary penalty, SpeedRoute has been censured and ordered to overhaul its compliance framework, including enhancing its written supervisory procedures (WSPs) for market access controls and strengthening its AML program.
Despite being rich in oil, Nigeria struggles with refining shortages. What’s behind this paradox, and how are different actors reacting?