Abstract:On October 11, both the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) took enforcement actions against Bittrex due to alleged violations of sanctions programs and reporting requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).
On October 11, both the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and the U.S. Department of the Treasurys Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) took enforcement actions against Bittrex due to alleged violations of sanctions programs and reporting requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).
According to the OFAC‘s announcement, the crypto exchange agreed to an over $24-million settlement, as investigations by OFAC and FinCEN revealed that the exchange apparently violated multiple sanctions programs and willful violations of the Bank Secrecy Act’s (BSAs) anti-money laundering (AML) and suspicious activity report (SAR) reporting requirements.
Likewise, FinCEN announced the assessment of a civil money penalty valued at $29,280,829.20 against Bittrex, for violating the BSA and FinCENs implementing regulations. FinCEN said its actions are part of a global settlement with the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).
Bittrex did not take appropriate measures to deal with risks related to its products and services, including anonymity-enhanced cryptos, and did not effectively monitor transactions on its trading platform, said FinCEN.
The exchange transacted with entities and individuals located in jurisdictions subject to comprehensive OFAC sanctions, said FinCEN. OFAC said Bittrex did not screen customer information for terms related to sanctioned jurisdictions.
According to OFAC Director Andrea Gacki, “when virtual currency firms fail to implement effective sanctions compliance controls, including screening customers located in sanctioned jurisdictions, they can become a vehicle for illicit actors that threaten U.S national security.”
The main trading dashboard account of a trader for LQH Markets was completely deleted by a broker. The trader is not being offered any access to their funds or profits. This incident shows the risks of trading markets and brokers and the importance of protecting your funds without relying on any broker.
According to report, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) announced today that it has entered into a settlement agreement with ZFN EUROPE Ltd for the amount of €20,000. This settlement resolves a regulatory inquiry into ZFN Europe’s compliance with Cyprus’s Investment Services and Activities and Regulated Markets Law of 2017, as amended.
PrimeXBT launches stock CFDs on MetaTrader 5, offering shares of major U.S. companies with crypto or USD margin for enhanced multi-asset trading.
FXTM and AvaTrade are two well-established online brokers offering forex and CFD trading across global markets. Both enjoy strong reputations and high ratings on WikiFX—FXTM holds an AAA overall rating, while AvaTrade scores 9.49/10, indicating they’re regarded as reliable choices by the community. However, since brokers have great reputation in the industry, how do we know which one is more suitable for individuals to invest in? Today's article is about the comparison between FXTM and AvaTrade.